I’m also part of the big corporate law firm world and his description of the dynamics are 100% true in my experience and widely understood there as well. I’m commenting on the “ case for revolving doors” comment.įirst, I have roughly the same background as theory, the previous commenter. Congratulations to the subreddit on reaching 10,000 subscribers.
If you guys had just written this up as an adversarial collaboration, you could have been well on your way to winning $2000 by now.ģ. Comments of the week: a German economist explains ordoliberalism, a lawyer makes a surprising case for why one might not want to ban a revolving door from regulatory agencies to industry, Nabil al Dajjal tries to summarize the latest Hotel Concierge (if only there were something in between Nabil’s length and Concierge’s), and a bunch of people have a very long debate about why the FAA does what it does. See more information here – they seem to want “expressions of interest” by May 25.Ģ.
The Future of Humanity Institute is starting a “Research Scholars Program”, offering salaried positions plus training and mentoring to early-career researchers interested in the same big-picture topics FHI is – AI, existential risk, far-future technologies, utilitarianism, and the like. You can also talk at the SSC subreddit or the SSC Discord server. Post about anything you want, ask random questions, whatever. This is the bi-weekly visible open thread (there are also hidden open threads twice a week you can reach through the Open Thread tab on the top of the page).